<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Writing MiniDumps in C#</title>
	<link>http://blog.kalmbach-software.de/2008/12/13/writing-minidumps-in-c/</link>
	<description>Infos about Windows development and dotNET Framework</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 10:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jochen Kalmbach&#8217;s Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Better sos.dll for debugging in WinDbg available!</title>
		<link>http://blog.kalmbach-software.de/2008/12/13/writing-minidumps-in-c/#comment-994</link>
		<dc:creator>Jochen Kalmbach&#8217;s Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Better sos.dll for debugging in WinDbg available!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 12:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.kalmbach-software.de/2008/12/13/writing-minidumps-in-c/#comment-994</guid>
		<description>[...] Also it has a good &#8220;!Analysis&#8221; command for dump-files. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Also it has a good &#8220;!Analysis&#8221; command for dump-files. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jochen Kalmbach’s Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Source-Indexing (TFS) und Smbols-Store</title>
		<link>http://blog.kalmbach-software.de/2008/12/13/writing-minidumps-in-c/#comment-582</link>
		<dc:creator>Jochen Kalmbach’s Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Source-Indexing (TFS) und Smbols-Store</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 14:51:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.kalmbach-software.de/2008/12/13/writing-minidumps-in-c/#comment-582</guid>
		<description>[...] einzige was Du bekommst ist ein Dump-File (z.B. entweder via WER oder durch eigenes schreiben von MiniDumpWriteDump). Jetzt beginnt für Dich das [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] einzige was Du bekommst ist ein Dump-File (z.B. entweder via WER oder durch eigenes schreiben von MiniDumpWriteDump). Jetzt beginnt für Dich das [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jkalmbach</title>
		<link>http://blog.kalmbach-software.de/2008/12/13/writing-minidumps-in-c/#comment-152</link>
		<dc:creator>jkalmbach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 14:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.kalmbach-software.de/2008/12/13/writing-minidumps-in-c/#comment-152</guid>
		<description>If you have a mixed-mode app, then you can't log the exeption. Also you never get line-infos (except if you redistribute the PDB, which is not a good idea).
The main advantages is "line-numbers"...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you have a mixed-mode app, then you can&#8217;t log the exeption. Also you never get line-infos (except if you redistribute the PDB, which is not a good idea).<br />
The main advantages is &#8220;line-numbers&#8221;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nico</title>
		<link>http://blog.kalmbach-software.de/2008/12/13/writing-minidumps-in-c/#comment-151</link>
		<dc:creator>nico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 14:39:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.kalmbach-software.de/2008/12/13/writing-minidumps-in-c/#comment-151</guid>
		<description>Hi Jochen,

Do you think minidumps are better solution than simply logging the error ?
What information can we have with a minidumps that we can't have with a logging solution ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jochen,</p>
<p>Do you think minidumps are better solution than simply logging the error ?<br />
What information can we have with a minidumps that we can&#8217;t have with a logging solution ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hefe</title>
		<link>http://blog.kalmbach-software.de/2008/12/13/writing-minidumps-in-c/#comment-145</link>
		<dc:creator>Hefe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 01:51:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.kalmbach-software.de/2008/12/13/writing-minidumps-in-c/#comment-145</guid>
		<description>Hi, Jochen, Would you like to tell me about your email address, i wanna communicate with you about some details about the STACKWALKER, thanks

with regards, hefe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Jochen, Would you like to tell me about your email address, i wanna communicate with you about some details about the STACKWALKER, thanks</p>
<p>with regards, hefe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jkalmbach</title>
		<link>http://blog.kalmbach-software.de/2008/12/13/writing-minidumps-in-c/#comment-144</link>
		<dc:creator>jkalmbach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 15:38:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.kalmbach-software.de/2008/12/13/writing-minidumps-in-c/#comment-144</guid>
		<description>This is a hard question... in general it is always safer to write the dump out-of-process, especially for stack-overflows... but as you said: this is at least true for unmanaged code. I generate (in-process) minidumps for managed code since several months without any problems (except that it does not support source-lines...)
So: I can't answer your question...

MS would say: Please use WER (Windows Error Reporting)! Then you don't have to care about this, because the dump is written out-of-process.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a hard question&#8230; in general it is always safer to write the dump out-of-process, especially for stack-overflows&#8230; but as you said: this is at least true for unmanaged code. I generate (in-process) minidumps for managed code since several months without any problems (except that it does not support source-lines&#8230;)<br />
So: I can&#8217;t answer your question&#8230;</p>
<p>MS would say: Please use WER (Windows Error Reporting)! Then you don&#8217;t have to care about this, because the dump is written out-of-process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Sherman</title>
		<link>http://blog.kalmbach-software.de/2008/12/13/writing-minidumps-in-c/#comment-143</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Sherman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 15:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.kalmbach-software.de/2008/12/13/writing-minidumps-in-c/#comment-143</guid>
		<description>Hi Jochen,

For native code, many people recommend that the faulting process simply signal another process to generate the dump. But in the case of .NET exceptions, I would think that the data structures of the faulting process would not be corrupt and it would be okay to write the dump in process. What's your opinion?

thanks,
Marc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jochen,</p>
<p>For native code, many people recommend that the faulting process simply signal another process to generate the dump. But in the case of .NET exceptions, I would think that the data structures of the faulting process would not be corrupt and it would be okay to write the dump in process. What&#8217;s your opinion?</p>
<p>thanks,<br />
Marc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hefe</title>
		<link>http://blog.kalmbach-software.de/2008/12/13/writing-minidumps-in-c/#comment-141</link>
		<dc:creator>Hefe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 03:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.kalmbach-software.de/2008/12/13/writing-minidumps-in-c/#comment-141</guid>
		<description>Hay, Jochen! I retrieve your article and codes about STACKWALKER from codeproject.com. And I encounted some problems when i tried to wrap your code as a dll, i have no idea about the solution, if you see these words, please send me a email, and i'll post you the sceenshots, thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hay, Jochen! I retrieve your article and codes about STACKWALKER from codeproject.com. And I encounted some problems when i tried to wrap your code as a dll, i have no idea about the solution, if you see these words, please send me a email, and i&#8217;ll post you the sceenshots, thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

